LegalTech Diaries Volume 19 features six leaders from across legal. One question runs through their conversations: once AI is part of the work, who decides how it is used, measured and governed?

Several interviewees point to the gaps between teams and systems. Work passes from the business to procurement to legal, and enforcement splinters across agencies, law firms and monitoring tools. The risk often sits in those handoffs, and the fix is setting the rules before the work starts.

The conversations also ask harder questions. If efficiency is now table stakes, what should a legal team measure instead? How much can an agent decide alone? Why is context harder to solve than citation or privilege? And what responsibility comes with technology that could widen access to justice?

In-house teams are a strong thread throughout, from tools shaped by a company’s own playbooks and risk tolerance to a legal department testing its company’s AI on its own work. There is also a look at deepfake scam ads, which are already costing brands money.

Featuring perspectives from Harvey, Thomson Reuters, Wordsmith, Omnea, GC AI and IProtect, Volume 19 explores the decisions, structures and judgement behind legal AI that works in practice.

Step inside Volume 19.