16-17 June 2027 – London, InterContinental O2 | Magazine

LegalTech Diaries Volume 16

Nate Skinner

CRO
8am

LegalTech Diaries Volume 16

Nate Skinner

CRO
8am

8am’s own 2026 Legal Industry Report found that nearly seven in ten legal professionals now use generative AI for work, yet most firms still lack formal AI policies or training programmes. Where does the responsibility sit for closing that gap, and what role should platform providers like 8am be playing?

Our customers work in a complex business and have complex needs. At 8am, we prioritise meeting customers where they are, especially in their AI journey.

Our recent Legal Industry Report highlighted that AI adoption may be accelerating, but the organisational structures, policies, and leadership readiness are still catching up. In other words, AI is already showing up in the way legal professionals work, whether a firm has a formal policy in place. Firms are no longer making a choice between AI adoption or non-adoption. Their choice is between guided adoption or unmanaged adoption. 

Professional business platforms like 8am and others have real responsibilities here. We cannot simply ship AI capabilities into the market and assume every firm has the time, resources, or technical depth to operationalise them safely. Our role is to be thoughtful and strategic in how we make AI useful, secure, and practical inside the workflows legal professionals already depend on to run their firms. 

At 8am, we think about this through a customer-first lens. Legal professionals do not need AI for the sake of AI. They need technology that helps them answer questions faster, find the right information, automate routine work, streamline billing, improve visibility into financial performance, and ultimately make better decisions without creating new risk. That requires more than a feature. It requires guardrails, education, transparency, and product experiences that respect the realities of legal work.

Also, a lot of AI education is still too abstract. Firms need guidance on real use cases: the impact AI is having in the industry, where there are risks, what should be optimised, and how AI fits into the work their teams do every day. The best professional business platforms should help close that gap by embedding responsible use into the product itself, not leaving it entirely to the customer to figure out later.

The legal technology market is increasingly split between specialist AI point solutions and integrated platforms. How do you see that tension resolving over the next few years, and where does 8am position itself in that landscape?

The resolution to any tension is outcome based. There will always be room for specialist tools, especially when they solve a very specific problem. But legal professionals are already managing too much complexity. They do not want more disconnected tools, more logins, more data silos, or workflows that require them to stitch together the system themselves. Most want to just focus on the practice of law, not the business of law. The bigger opportunity is integration. Integrative technology understands the work, the data, the permissions, the client context, and the business process around it.

Over the next few years, I think firms will become much more discerning. Early AI adoption was naturally experimental. People wanted to see what was possible. But as the market matures, the question becomes: does this actually help my firm operate better? Does it improve client service? Does it reduce administrative burden? Does it make the professional more effective? Does it fit within the systems we already use?

That is where 8am is positioned. We are building an integrated professional business platform for legal, accounting, and client-focused professionals. Our view is that AI should sit within the operating system of the firm, not off to the side as another disconnected tool. With 8am IQ, for example, the goal is to help professionals work with their own data more effectively.

The firms that get the most value from AI will not be the ones with the longest list of tools. They will be the ones that connect AI to real workflows, real customer needs, and measurable business outcomes.

You’ve spent over 25 years in digital marketing, revenue strategy and brand development across multiple technology sectors. What has surprised you most about selling into the legal industry specifically, and what do you think legal technology vendors consistently get wrong about their buyers?

Legal work is some of the highest stakes work there is, and it’s our job to develop a deep understanding of the complex needs of our customers. At 8am we start by understanding the reality our customers face and what they need to support and grow their businesses. That means understanding that no two law firms are alike. They all buy and operate in their own way. The needs of a solo practitioner, a small firm, and a larger organisation can be very different, even if they are solving similar categories of problems. A good go-to-market motion has to account for that. We’re constantly looking for ways to better align with our customers and their needs.

I believe strongly in systems. Growth does not come from one campaign, one sales pitch, or one feature launch. It comes from understanding the customer journey end to end and making sure every touchpoint reinforces the same story. In legal tech, that story has to be grounded in trust and value.

Join 5,000+ legal leaders shaping the future of law for two days of insight, innovation and unmissable networking — now with your biggest saving!